固体氧化物电解池阳极材料研究进展

doi:10.13208/j.electrochem.2215006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来，固体氧化物电解池（SOEC）作为一种高效的电化学能量转换装置，由于其大电流密度、高法拉第效率和高能量效率受到广泛的关注。阳极析氧反应（OER）是SOEC中重要的电极反应，涉及四电子转移过程，反应动力学缓慢，在电解过程中阳极极化电阻较大且能耗高。因此，设计高效稳定的阳极材料对提高SOEC性能及推动SOEC实际应用至关重要。近年来，高性能阳极研究取得了一系列进展。在本综述中，重点介绍了CO₂和H₂O电解的反应机理，总结了不同类型阳极材料的物理化学和电化学性能，讨论了各种有效的阳极优化策略。此外，还对SOEC的未来研究进行了展望。这对阳极材料的发展和SOEC的实际应用有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 固体氧化物电解池, 阳极材料, CO₂ 和/或H₂O电解, 钙钛矿氧化物

Abstract:

Solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) as an electrochemical energy conversion device has attracted increasing attention due to its large current density, high Faradaic efficiency and energy efficiency. Oxygen evolution reaction at the anode, a four-electron transfer process, is an important half-reaction for SOEC, which contributes to the main polarization resistance and consumes most electric energy during the electrolysis process. Hence, designing anode materials with high activity and stability is crucial for the performance improvement and practical application of SOEC. Recently, some advances have been made in the development of high-performance anode. In the current review, the mechanisms for CO₂ and/or H₂O electrolysis are highlighted. The physicochemical and electrochemical properties of different types of anodes are summarized. Various efficient strategies for anode optimization are introduced. Furthermore, the outlook for the future research of SOEC is included. This review might be helpful for the development of anode materials and the practical application of SOEC.

Key words: Solid oxide electrolysis cell, Anode materials, CO₂ and/or H₂O electrolysis, Perovskite oxide

邹庚, 冯炜程, 宋月锋, 汪国雄. 固体氧化物电解池阳极材料研究进展[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2023, 29(2): 2215006.

Geng Zou, Wei-Cheng Feng, Yue-Feng Song, Guo-Xiong Wang. Recent Advances in Anode Materials of Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry, 2023, 29(2): 2215006.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://electrochem.xmu.edu.cn/CN/10.13208/j.electrochem.2215006

https://electrochem.xmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V29/I2/2215006

图/表 11

参考文献 100

[1]	Sussmann R, Rettinger M. Can we measure a COVID-19-related slowdown in atmospheric CO₂ growth? sensitivity of total carbon column observations[J]. Rem. Sens., 2020, 12(15): 2387. doi: 10.3390/rs12152387 URL
[2]	Song Y F, Zhang X M, Xie K, Wang G X, Bao X H. High-temperature CO₂ electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells: Developments, challenges, and prospects[J]. Adv. Mater., 2019, 31(50): 1902033. doi: 10.1002/adma.v31.50 URL
[3]	Song Y F, Zhang X M, Zhou Y J, Lü H F, Liu Q X, Feng W C, Wang G X, Bao X H. Improving the performance of solid oxide electrolysis cell with gold nanoparticles-modified LSM-YSZ anode[J]. J. Energy Chem., 2019, 35: 181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.03.013 URL
[4]	Wu T, Zhang W Q, Li Y F, Zheng Y, Yu B, Chen J, Sun X M. Micro-/nanohoneycomb solid oxide electrolysis cell anodes with ultralarge current tolerance[J]. Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8(33): 1802203. doi: 10.1002/aenm.v8.33 URL
[5]	Fleig J. Solid oxide fuel cell cathodes: Polarization mechanisms and modeling of the electrochemical performance[J]. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2003, 33: 361-382. doi: 10.1146/matsci.2003.33.issue-1 URL
[6]	Shirai Y, Hashimoto S, Sato K, Yashiro K, Amezawa K, Mizusaki J, Kawada T. Crystal structure and thermal expansion behavior of oxygen stoichiometric lanthanum strontium manganite at high temperature[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2014, 256: 83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.042 URL
[7]	Shen M H, Ai F J, Ma H L, Xu H, Zhang Y Y. Progress and prospects of reversible solid oxide fuel cell materials[J]. Iscience, 2021, 24(12): 103464. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103464 URL
[8]	Mikkelsen L, Skou E. Determination of the oxygen chemical diffusion coefficient in perovskites by a thermogravimetric method[J]. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2001, 64(3): 873-878. doi: 10.1023/A:1011542123348 URL
[9]	Ebbesen S D, Mogensen M. Electrolysis of carbon dioxide in solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2009, 193(1): 349-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.093 URL
[10]	Steele B C H, Hori K M, Uchino S. Kinetic parameters influencing the performance of IT-SOFC composite electrodes[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2000, 135(1): 445-450. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00393-3 URL
[11]	Chen K F, Jiang S P. Failure mechanism of (La,Sr)MnO₃ oxygen electrodes of solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(17): 10541-10549. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.103 URL
[12]	Knibbe R, Traulsen M L, Hauch A, Ebbesen S D, Mogensen M. Solid oxide electrolysis cells: Degradation at high current densities[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2010, 157(8): B1209-B1217. doi: 10.1149/1.3447752 URL
[13]	Mahata A, Datta P, Basu R N. Synthesis and characterization of Ca doped LaMnO₃ as potential anode material for solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Ceram. Int., 2017, 43(1): 433-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.177 URL
[14]	Fang Q P, Menzler N H, Blum L. Degradation analysis of long-term solid oxide fuel cell stacks with respect to chromium poisoning in La_0.58Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O₃_-δ and La_0.6Sr_0.4CoO₃_-δ cathodes[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2021, 168(10): 104505. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac2c11
[15]	Develos Bagarinao K, De Vero J, Kishimoto H, Ishiyama T, Yamaji K, Horita T, Yokokawa H. Multilayered LSC and GDC: An approach for designing cathode materials with superior oxygen exchange properties for solid oxide fuel cells[J]. Nano Energy, 2018, 52: 369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.014 URL
[16]	Zheng Y F, Li Q S, Chen T, Wu W, Xu C, Wang W G. Comparison of performance and degradation of large-scale solid oxide electrolysis cells in stack with different composite air electrodes[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(6): 2460-2472. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.101 URL
[17]	Sharma V I, Yildiz B. Degradation mechanism in La_0.8Sr_0.2CoO₃ as contact layer on the solid oxide electrolysis cell anode[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2010, 157(3): B441-B448. doi: 10.1149/1.3288835 URL
[18]	Zheng H Y, Tian Y F, Zhang L L, Chi B, Pu J, Jian L. La_0.8Sr_0.2Co_0.8Ni_0.2o₃_-δ impregnated oxygen electrode for H₂O/CO₂ co-electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2018, 383: 93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.041 URL
[19]	Tan Y, Duan N Q, Wang A, Yan D, Chi B, Wang N, Pu J, Li J. Performance enhancement of solution impregnated nanostructured La_0.8Sr_0.2Co_0.8Ni_0.2O₃_-δ oxygen electrode for intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2016, 305: 168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.094 URL
[20]	Chrzan A, Ovtar S, Jasinski P, Chen M, Hauch A. High performance LaNi₁_-xCo_xO₃_-δ(x=0.4 to 0.7) infiltrated oxygen electrodes for reversible solid oxide cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2017, 353: 67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.148 URL
[21]	Duan N Q, Yang J J, Gao M R, Zhang B W, Luo J L, Du Y H, Xu M H, Jia L C, Chi B, Li J. Multi-functionalities enabled fivefold applications of LaCo_0.6Ni_0.4O_3-_δ in intermediate temperature symmetrical solid oxide fuel/electrolysis cells[J]. Nano Energy, 2020, 77: 105207. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105207 URL
[22]	Ma Q L, Dierickx S, Vibhu V, Sebold D, de Haart L G J, Weber A, Guillon O, Menzler N H. Performances of solid oxide cells with La_0.97Ni_0.5Co_0.5O_3-_δ as air-electrodes[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2020, 167(8): 084522. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab91cc
[23]	Khan M S, Xu X Y, Li M R, Rehman A U, Knibbe R, Yago A J, Zhu Z H. Evaluation of SrCo_0.8Nb_0.2O₃_-δ, SrCo_0.8Ta_0.2O₃_-δ and SrCo_0.8Nb_0.1Ta_0.1O₃_-δ as air electrode materials for solid oxide electrolysis and reversible solid oxide cells[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 321: 134654. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134654 URL
[24]	Patrakeev M V, Bahteeva J A, Mitberg E B, Leonidov I A, Kozhevnikov V L, Poeppelmeier KR. Electron/hole and ion transport in La₁_-xSr_xFeo₃_-δ[J]. J. Solid State Chem., 2003, 172(1): 219-231. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4596(03)00040-9 URL
[25]	Niu Y J, Sunarso J, Liang F L, Zhou W, Zhu Z H, Shao Z P. A comparative study of oxygen reduction reaction on Bi- and La-doped SrFeO_3-_δ perovskite cathodes[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2011, 158(2): B132-B138. doi: 10.1149/1.3521316 URL
[26]	Chavan S V, Singh R N. Preparation, properties, and reactivity of lanthanum strontium ferrite as an intermediate temperature SOFC cathode[J]. J. Mater. Sci., 2013, 48(19): 6597-6604. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7456-9 URL
[27]	Fan H, Zhang Y L, Han M F. Infiltration of La_0·6Sr_0·4FeO₃_-δ nanoparticles into YSZ scaffold for solid oxide fuel cell and solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 723: 620-626. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.018 URL
[28]	Guan C Z, Wang Y D, Chen K F, Xiao G P, Lin X, Zhou J, Song S Z, Wang J Q, Zhu Z Y, Zhou X D. Molten salt synthesis of Nb-doped (La, Sr)FeO₃ as the oxygen electrode for reversible solid oxide cells[J]. Mater. Lett., 2019, 245: 114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.02.116 URL
[29]	Cui C S, Wang Y, Tong Y C, Wang S W, Chen C S, Zhan Z L. Syngas production through CH₄-assisted co-electrolysis of H₂O and CO₂ in La_0.8Sr_0.2Cr_0.5Fe_0.5O₃_-δ-Zr_0.84Y_0.16O₂_-δ electrode-supported solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(39): 20305-20312. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.177 URL
[30]	Tian Y F, Zheng H Y, Zhang L L, Chi B, Pu J, Li J. Direct electrolysis of CO₂ in symmetrical solid oxide electrolysis cell based on La_0.6Sr_0.4Fe_0.8Ni_0.2O₃_-δ electrode[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2018, 165(2): F17-F23. doi: 10.1149/2.0351802jes URL
[31]	Zhang L J, Li Y H, Zhang B Z, Wan Y H, Xu Z Q, Zhang S W, Zhu TL, Xia C R. O₃_-δ perovskite with in-situ constructed FeNi₃ nanoparticles as fuel electrode for reversible solid oxide cell[J]. Int. J. Energ. Res., 2021, 45(15): 21264-21273. doi: 10.1002/er.v45.15 URL
[32]	Peng X Z, Tian Y F, Liu Y, Wang W J, Jia L C, Pu J, Chi B, Li J. An efficient symmetrical solid oxide electrolysis cell with LSFM-based electrodes for direct electrolysis of pure CO₂[J]. J. CO₂ Util., 2020, 36: 18-24.
[33]	Tian Y F, Wang W J, Liu Y, Zhang L L, Jia L C, Yang J, Chi B, Pu J, Li J. Cobalt-free perovskite oxide La_0.6Sr_0.4Fe_0.8Ni_0.2O_3-_δ as active and robust oxygen electrode for reversible solid oxide cells[J]. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2019, 2(5): 3297-3305. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b00115 URL
[34]	Zheng Y F, Wang S, Pan Z H, Yin B. Electrochemical CO₂ reduction to Co using solid oxide electrolysis cells with high-performance Ta-doped bismuth strontium ferrite air electrode[J]. Energy, 2021, 228: 120579. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120579 URL
[35]	Berger C, Bucher E, Gspan C, Sitte W. Crystal structure, oxygen nonstoichiometry, and mass and charge transport properties of the Sr-free SOFC/SOEC air electrode material La_0.75Ca_0.25FeO₃_-δ[J]. J. Solid State Chem., 2019, 273: 92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2019.02.032 URL
[36]	Tian Y F, Zhang L L, Liu Y, Jia L C, Yang J, Chi B, Pu J, Li J. A self-recovering robust electrode for highly efficient CO₂ electrolysis in symmetrical solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7(11): 6395-6400. doi: 10.1039/C9TA00643E URL
[37]	Tan T, Wang Z M, Qin M X, Zhong W T, Hu J H, Yang C H, Liu M L. In situ exsolution of core-shell structured NiFe/FeO_x nanoparticles on Pr_0.4Sr_1.6(NiFe)_1.5Mo_0.5O₆_-δ for CO₂electrolysis[J]. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32(34): 2202878. doi: 10.1002/adfm.v32.34 URL
[38]	Zhang L H, Xu C M, Sun W, Ren R Z, Yang X X, Luo Y Z, Qiao J S, Wang Z H, Zhen S Y, Sun K N. Constructing perovskite/alkaline-earth metal composite heterostructure by infiltration to revitalize CO₂ electrolysis[J]. Sep. Purif. Technol., 2022, 298: 121475. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121475 URL
[39]	Simrick N J, Kilner J A, Atkinson A, Rupp J L M, Ryll T M, Bieberle-Hütter A, Galinski H, Gauckler L J. Micro-fabrication of patterned LSCF thin-film cathodes with gold current collectors[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2011, 192(1): 619-626. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.03.025 URL
[40]	Jiang S P. A comparison of O₂ reduction reactions on porous (La,Sr)MnO₃ and (La,Sr)(Co,Fe)O₃ electrodes[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2002, 146(1): 1-22. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00997-3 URL
[41]	Laguna-Bercero M A, Kilner J A, Skinner S J. Development of oxygen electrodes for reversible solid oxide fuel cells with scandia stabilized zirconia electrolytes[J]. Solid State Ionics, 2011, 192(1): 501-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.01.003 URL
[42]	Lei C, Simpson M F, Virkar A V. Investigation of ion and electron conduction in the mixed ionic-electronic conductor-La-Sr-Co-Fe-oxide (LSCF) using alternating current (ac) and direct current (dc) techniques[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2022, 169(1): 014506. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac43d8
[43]	Tai L W, Nasrallah M M, Anderson H U, Sparlin D M, Sehlin S R. Structure and electrical properties of La_1-_xSr_xCo_1-_yFe_yO₃. Part 2. The system La_1-_xSr_xCo_0.2Fe_0.8O₃[J]. Solid State Ionics, 1995, 76(3): 273-283. doi: 10.1016/0167-2738(94)00245-N URL
[44]	Ai N, He S, Li N, Zhang Q, Rickard W D A, Chen K F, Zhang T, Jiang S P. Suppressed Sr segregation and performance of directly assembled La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O₃_-δ oxygen electrode on Y₂O₃-ZrO₂ electrolyte of solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2018, 384: 125-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.082 URL
[45]	Yang Z B, Wang N, Ma C Y, Jin X F, Lei Z, Xiong X Y, Peng S P. Co-electrolysis of H₂O-CO₂in a solid oxide electrolysis cell with symmetrical La_0.4Sr_0.6Co_0.2Fe_0.7Nb_0.1O_3-_δ electrode[J]. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2019, 836: 107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.01.064 URL
[46]	Shao Z P, Yang W S, Cong Y, Dong H, Tong J H, Xiong G X. Investigation of the permeation behavior and stability of a Ba_0.5Sr_0.5Co_0.8Fe_0.2O₃_-δ oxygen membrane[J]. J. Membr. Sci., 2000, 172(1-2): 177-188. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00337-9 URL
[47]	Liang F Y, Jiang H Q, Luo H X, Kriegel R, Caro J. High-purity oxygen production by a dead-end Ba_0.5Sr_0.5Co_0.8Fe_0.2O_3-_δ tube membrane[J]. Catal. Today, 2012, 193(1): 95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.12.016 URL
[48]	Shiiba H, Bishop C L, Rushton M J D, Nakayama M, Nogami M, Kilner J A, Grimes R W. Effect of a-site cation disorder on oxygen diffusion in perovskite-type Ba_0.5Sr_0.5Co₁_-xFe_xO_2.5[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1(35): 10345-10352. doi: 10.1039/c3ta10382j URL
[49]	Wang L, Merkle R, Maier J. Oxygen reduction kinetics and transport properties of (Ba,Sr)(Co,Fe)O₃_-δ and related SOFC cathode materials[J]. ECS Trans., 2009, 25(2): 2497-2505. doi: 10.1149/1.3205805 URL
[50]	Yu B, Zhang W Q, Xu J M, Chen J. Microstructural characterization and electrochemical properties of Ba_0.5Sr_0.5Co_0.8Fe_0.2O_3-_δ and its application for anode of SOEC[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(23): 6873-6877. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.066 URL
[51]	Wang H H, Cong Y, Yang W S. Investigation on the partial oxidation of methane to syngas in a tubular Ba_0.5Sr_0.5Co_0.8Fe_0.2O_3-_δ membrane reactor[J]. Catal. Today, 2003, 82(1): 157-166. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00228-1 URL
[52]	Li M, Hua B, Chen J, Zhong Y M, Luo J L. Charge transfer dynamics in RuO₂/perovskite nanohybrid for enhanced electrocatalysis in solid oxide electrolyzers[J]. Nano Energy, 2019, 57: 186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.048 URL
[53]	Prasopchokkul P, Seeharaj P, Kim-Lohsoontorn P. Ba_0·5Sr_0·5(Co_0·8Fe_0.2)₁_-xTa_xO₃_-δ perovskite anode in solid oxide electrolysis cell for hydrogen production from high-temperature steam electrolysis[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(10): 7023-7036. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.219 URL
[54]	Yang Z B, Jin C, Yang C H, Han M F, Chen F L. Ba_0.9Co_0.5Fe_0.4Nb_0.1O_3-_δ as novel oxygen electrode for solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(18): 11572-11577. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.183 URL
[55]	He B B, Zhao L, Song S X, Liu T, Chen F L, Xia C R. Sr₂Fe_1.5Mo_0.5O₆_-δ-Sm_0.2Ce_0.8O_1.9 composite anodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2012, 159(5): B619-B626. doi: 10.1149/2.020206jes URL
[56]	Zhang S W, Zhu K, Hu X Y, Peng R R, Xia C R. Antimony doping to greatly enhance the electrocatalytic performance of Sr₂Fe_1.5Mo_0.5O₆_-δ perovskite as a ceramic anode for solid oxide fuel cells[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9(43): 24336-24347. doi: 10.1039/D1TA06196H URL
[57]	Liu Q, Yang C H, Dong X H, Chen F L. Perovskite Sr₂Fe_1.5Mo_0.5O_6-_δ as electrode materials for symmetrical solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(19): 10039-10044. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.016 URL
[58]	Dai N N, Feng J, Wang Z H, Jiang T Z, Sun W, Qiao J S, Sun K N. Synthesis and characterization of B-site Ni-doped perovskites Sr₂Fe_1.5_-xNi_xMo_0.5O₆_-δ (x=0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4) as cathodes for sofcs[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1(45): 14147-14153. doi: 10.1039/c3ta13607h URL
[59]	Yang Y R, Wang Y H, Yang Z B, Chen Y, Peng S P. A highly active and durable electrode with in situ exsolved Co nanoparticles for solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2020, 478: 229082. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229082 URL
[60]	Yang Y, Shi N, Xie Y, Li X Y, Hu X Y, Zhu K, Huan D M, Peng R R, Xia C R, Lu Y L. K doping as a rational method to enhance the sluggish air-electrode reaction kinetics for proton-conducting solid oxide cells[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2021, 389: 138453. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138453 URL
[61]	Wei B, Chen K, Zhao L, Ai N, Lü Z, Jiang S P. SmBaCo₂O₅₊_δ as high efficient oxygen electrode of solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. ECS Trans., 2013, 57(1): 3189-3196. doi: 10.1149/05701.3189ecst URL
[62]	Zheng Y F, Yang H, Pan Z H, Zhang C Z. A Ca and Fe co-doped layered perovskite as stable air electrode in solid oxide electrolyzer cells under high-current electrolysis[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 251: 581-587. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.172 URL
[63]	Niu B B, Lu C L, Yi W D, Luo S J, Li X N, Zhong X W, Zhao X Z, Xu B M. In-situ growth of nanoparticles-decorated double perovskite electrode materials for symmetrical solid oxide cells[J]. Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 270: 118842. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118842 URL
[64]	Jun A, Kim J, Shin J, Kim G. Achieving high efficiency and eliminating degradation in solid oxide electrochemical cells using high oxygen-capacity perovskite[J]. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55(40): 12512-12515. doi: 10.1002/anie.201606972 pmid: 27604172
[65]	Tian Y F, Yan D, Chi B, Chen J, Li X, Li J. Preparation and properties of PrBa_0.5Sr_0.5Co_1.5Fe_0.5O₅₊_δ as novel oxygen electrode for solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. ECS Trans., 2017, 78(1): 533-541. doi: 10.1149/07801.0533ecst URL
[66]	Vibhu V, Flura A, Rougier A, Nicollet C, Fourcade S, Hungria T, Grenier J C, Bassat J M. Electrochemical ageing study of mixed lanthanum/praseodymium nickelates La₂_-xPr_xNiO₄₊_δ as oxygen electrodes for solid oxide fuel or electrolysis cells[J]. J. Energy Chem., 2020, 46: 62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.10.012 URL
[67]	Chauveau F, Mougin J, Bassat J M, Mauvy F, Grenier J C. A new anode material for solid oxide electrolyser: The neodymium nickelate Nd₂NiO₄₊_δ[J]. J. Power Sources, 2010, 195(3): 744-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.003 URL
[68]	Chauveau F, Mougin J, Mauvy F, Bassat J M, Grenier J C. Electrochemical performances of cells containing alternative oxygen electrodes, Ln₂NiO₄₊_δ (Ln=Nd, La)[J]. ECS Trans., 2009, 25(2): 2557-2564. doi: 10.1149/1.3205812 URL
[69]	Kim S J, Kim K J, Dayaghi A M, Choi G M. Polarization and stability of La₂NiO₄₊_δ in comparison with La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3-_δ as air electrode of solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(33): 14498-14506. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.284 URL
[70]	Vibhu V, Vinke I C, Eichel R A, Bassat J M, de Haart L G J. La₂Ni_1-_xCoO₄₊_δ (x=0.0, 0.1 and 0.2) based efficient oxygen electrode materials for solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2019, 444: 227292. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227292 URL
[71]	Laguna-Bercero M A, Kinadjan N, Sayers R, El Shinawi H, Greaves C, Skinner S J. Performance of La₂_-xSr_xCo_0.5Ni_0.5O_4±_δ as an oxygen electrode for solid oxide reversible cells[J]. Fuel Cells, 2011, 11(1): 102-107. doi: 10.1002/fuce.201000067 URL
[72]	Ogier T, Mauvy F, Bassat J M, Laurencin J, Mougin J, Grenier J C. Overstoichiometric oxides Ln₂NiO₄₊_δ (Ln=La, Pr or Nd) as oxygen anodic electrodes for solid oxide electrolysis application[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(46): 15885-15892. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.107 URL
[73]	Vibhu V, Vinke I C, Eichel R A, de Haart L G J. Cobalt substituted Pr₂Ni₁_-xCoO₄₊_δ (x=0, 0.1, 0.2) oxygen electrodes: Impact on electrochemical performance and durability of solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2021, 482: 228909. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228909 URL
[74]	Huan D M, Zhang L, Zhang S W, Shi N, Li X Y, Zhu K, Xia C R, Peng R R, Lu Y L. Ruddlesden-popper oxide SrEu₂Fe₂O₇ as a promising symmetrical electrode for pure CO₂ electrolysis[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9(5): 2706-2713. doi: 10.1039/D0TA09585K URL
[75]	Zheng Y F, Jiang H G, Wang S, Qian B, Li Q S, Ge L, Chen H. Mn-doped ruddlesden-popper oxide La_1.5Sr_0.5NiO₄₊_δ as a novel air electrode material for solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Ceram. Int., 2021, 47(1): 1208-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.239 URL
[76]	Liu S M, Zhang W Q, Li Y F, Yu B. ReBaCO₂O₅₊_δ (Re = Pr, Nd, and Gd) as promising oxygen electrodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(27): 16332-16340. doi: 10.1039/C6RA28005F URL
[77]	Zhou Q J, He T M, Ji Y. SmBaCo₂O₅₊_x double-perovskite structure cathode material for intermediate-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2008, 185(2): 754-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.064 URL
[78]	Sun C Z, Kong Y, Shao L, Zhang Q, Wu X, Zhang N Q, Sun K N. Significant zirconium substitution effect on the oxygen reduction activity of the cathode material NdBaCo₂O₅₊_δ for solid oxide fuel cells[J]. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2019, 7(13): 11603-11611. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01486 URL
[79]	Du Z H, Li K Y, Zhao H L, Dong X, Zhang Y, Świerczek K. A SmBaCo₂O₅₊_δ double perovskite with epitaxially grown Sm_0.2Ce_0.8O_2-_δ nanoparticles as a promising cathode for solid oxide fuel cells[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8(28): 14162-14170. doi: 10.1039/D0TA05602B URL
[80]	Zhang L L, Tian Y F, Liu Y T, Jia L C, Yang J, Chi B, Pu J, Li J. Direct electrolysis of CO₂ in a symmetrical solid oxide electrolysis cell with spinel MnCo₂O₄ as electrode[J]. Chemelectrochem, 2019, 6(5): 1359-1364. doi: 10.1002/celc.v6.5 URL
[81]	Duan N Q, Gao M R, Hua B, Li M, Chi B, Li J, Luo J L. Exploring Ni(Mn_1/3Cr_2/3)₂O₄ spinel-based electrodes for solid oxide cells[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8(7): 3988-3998. doi: 10.1039/C9TA11878K URL
[82]	Kim D, Thaheem I, Yu H, Park J H, Lee K T. Highly promoted electrocatalytic activity of spinel CoFe₂O₄ by combining with Er_0.4Bi_1.6O₃ as a bifunctional oxygen electrode for reversible solid oxide cells[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2022, 10(4): 2045-2054. doi: 10.1039/D1TA07494F URL
[83]	Zhao Q, Yan Z H, Chen C C, Chen J. Spinels: Controlled preparation, oxygen reduction/evolution reaction application, and beyond[J]. Chem. Rev., 2017, 117(15): 10121-10211. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00051 pmid: 28745484
[84]	Yang C H, Jin C, Coffin A, Chen F L. Characterization of infiltrated (La_0.75Sr_0.25)_0.95MnO₃ as oxygen electrode for solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(11): 5187-5193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.049 URL
[85]	Song Y F, Zhang X M, Zhou Y J, Jiang Q K, Guan F, Lv H F, Wang G X, Bao X H. Promoting oxygen evolution reaction by RuO₂ nanoparticles in solid oxide CO₂ electrolyzer[J]. Energy Stor. Mater., 2018, 13: 207-214.
[86]	Zhang S L, Wang H Q, Lu M Y, Li C X, Li C J, Barnett S A. Electrochemical performance and stability of SrTi_0.3Fe_0.6Co_0.1O₃_-δ infiltrated La_0.8Sr_0.2MnO₃-Zr_0.92Y_0.16O₂_-δ oxygen electrodes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide electrochemical cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2019, 426: 233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.044 URL
[87]	Yun B H, Kim K J, Joh D W, Chae M S, Lee J J, Kim D W, Kang S, Choi D, Hong S T, Lee K T. Highly active and durable double-doped bismuth oxide-based oxygen electrodes for reversible solid oxide cells at reduced temperatures[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7(36): 20558-20566. doi: 10.1039/C9TA09203J URL
[88]	Li T P, Wang T P, Wei T, Hu X, Ye Z M, Wang Z, Dong D H, Chen B, Wang H T, Shao Z P. Robust anode-supported cells with fast oxygen release channels for efficient and stable CO₂ electrolysis at ultrahigh current densities[J]. Small, 2021, 17(6): 2007211. doi: 10.1002/smll.v17.6 URL
[89]	Wang Y, Xu J H, Meng X Y, Liu T, Chen F L. Ni infiltrated Sr₂Fe_1.5Mo_0.5O₆_-δ-Ce_0.8Sm_0.2O_1.9 electrode for methane assisted steam electrolysis process[J]. Electrochem. Commun., 2017, 79: 63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.04.018 URL
[90]	Liu T, Liu H, Zhang X Y, Lei L, Zhang Y X, Yuan Z H, Chen F L, Wang Y. A robust solid oxide electrolyzer for highly efficient electrochemical reforming of methane and steam[J]. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7(22): 13550-13558. doi: 10.1039/C9TA00467J URL
[91]	Chen K F, Ai N, Jiang S P. Performance and stability of (La,Sr)MnO₃-Y₂O₃-ZrO₂ composite oxygen electrodes under solid oxide electrolysis cell operation conditions[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(14): 10517-10525. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.073 URL
[92]	Liu Y, Tian Y F, Wang W J, Li Y T, Chattopadhyay S, Chi B, Pu J. Promoting electrocatalytic activity and stability via Er_0.4Bi_1.6O_3-_δ in situ decorated La_0.8Sr_0.2MnO_3-_δ oxygen electrode in reversible solid oxide cell[J]. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces., 2020, 12(52): 57941-57949. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c18583 URL
[93]	Chen K F, Ai N, Jiang S P. Development of (Gd,Ce)O₂-impregnated (La,Sr)MnO₃ anodes of high temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2010, 157(11): P89-P94. doi: 10.1149/1.3481436 URL
[94]	Gondolini A, Mercadelli E, Sanson A. Single step anode-supported solid oxide electrolyzer cell[J]. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2015, 35(16): 4617-4621. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.08.031 URL
[95]	Chen K F, Ai N, Jiang S P. Enhanced electrochemical performance and stability of (La,Sr)MnO₃-(Gd,Ce)O₂ oxygen electrodes of solid oxide electrolysis cells by palladium infiltration[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(2): 1301-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.015 URL
[96]	Tan Y, Gao S, Xiong C Y, Chi B. Nano-structured LSM-YSZ refined with PdO/ZrO₂ oxygen electrode for intermediate temperature reversible solid oxide cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(38): 19823-19830. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.116 URL
[97]	Men H J, Tian N, Qu Y M, Wang M, Zhao S, Yu J. Improved performance of a lanthanum strontium manganite-based oxygen electrode for an intermediate-temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell realized via ionic conduction enhancement[J]. Ceram. Int., 2019, 45(6): 7945-7949. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.107 URL
[98]	Khoshkalam M, Tripković Ð, Tong X F, Faghihi-Sani M A, Chen M, Hendriksen P V. Improving oxygen incorporation rate on (La_0.6Sr_0.4)_0.98FeO₃_-δ via Pr₂Ni₁_-xCu_xO₄₊_δ surface decoration[J]. J. Power Sources, 2020, 457: 228035. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228035 URL
[99]	Sar J, Charlot F, Almeida A, Dessemond L, Djurado E. Coral microstructure of graded CGO/LSCF oxygen electrode by electrostatic spray deposition for energy (IT-SOFC, SOEC)[J]. Fuel Cells, 2014, 14(3): 357-363. doi: 10.1002/fuce.201300146 URL
[100]	Cao J W, Li Y F, Zheng Y, Wang S B, Zhang W Q, Qin X F, Geng G, Yu B. A novel solid oxide electrolysis cell with mmicro-/nano channel anode for electrolysis at ultra-high current density over 5 A cm^-²[J]. Adv. Energy Mater., 2022: 2200899.

Material	Electrical conductivity (S·cm⁻¹)	Ionic conductivity (S·cm⁻¹)	D* (cm²·s⁻¹)	k* (cm·s⁻¹)	TEC (K⁻¹)
LSM[5, 6, 10]	1.0×10² (800 °C)	1.0×10⁻⁷-1.0×10⁻⁸ (800 °C)	3.2×10⁻¹⁶ (700 °C)	2.0×10⁻⁹ (700 °C)	ca. 10.0×10⁻⁶
LSC[14, 15]	1.6×10³ (800 °C)	2.2×10⁻¹ (800 °C)	9.5×10⁻⁷ (800 °C)	7.0×10⁻⁶ (800 °C)	20.5×10⁻⁶
LSF[24-26]	213.0 (650 °C)	0.2×10⁻²-4.7×10⁻² (800 °C)	———	———	11.7×10⁻⁶
LSCF[39, 40, 42, 43]	57.0 (600 °C)	2.6×10⁻⁴ (800 °C)	5.0×10⁻⁷ (900 °C)	4.0×10⁻⁵ (900 °C)	17.5×10⁻⁶
BSCF[47-49, 51]	———	1.9 (900 °C)	8.0×10⁻⁷ (800 °C)	5.0×10⁻⁵ (750 °C)	19.7×10⁻⁶
SFM[55, 56, 58]	20.9 (600 °C)	2.1×10⁻⁴ (800 °C)	9.0×10⁻⁶ (800 °C)	8.0×10⁻⁵ (800 °C)	ca. 16.0×10⁻⁶
PBC[76, 77]	645.0 (600 °C)	———	ca. 1.0×10⁻⁵ (350 °C)	ca. 1.0×10⁻³ (350 °C)	21.8×10⁻⁶
GBC[76, 77]	318.0 (600 °C)	———	3.0×10⁻⁷ (350 °C)	2.0×10⁻⁶ (350 °C)	19.3×10⁻⁶
NBC[76, 78]	308.0 (600 °C)	———	3.5×10⁻⁵ (700 °C)	ca. 3.0×10⁻⁴ (700 °C)	20.0×10⁻⁶
SBC[77, 79]	815.0-434.0 (500-800 °C)	———	2.8 × 10⁻⁶ (700 °C)	1.9 × 10⁻³ (700 °C)	———

Anode	Cathode	Fed gas	Current Density (A·cm⁻²)
LSM-YSZ[84]	Ni-YSZ	80% H₂O-20% H₂	0.85@1.3 V
RuO₂+LSM-YSZ[85]	Ni-YSZ	95% CO₂-5% N₂	0.74@1.2 V
Au+LSM-YSZ[3]	Ni-YSZ	95% CO₂-5% N₂	0.94@1.4 V
STFC+LSM-YSZ[86]	Ni-YSZ	50% H₂O-50% H₂	2.00@1.3 V
LSCN+LSM-GDC[19]	Ni-YSZ	42.8% H₂O-14.4% H₂-42.8% CO₂	1.16@1.3 V
LSM-DYSB[87]	Ni-YSZ	50% H₂O-50% H₂	1.32@1.3 V
LSC-GDC[16]	Ni-YSZ	90% H₂O-10% H₂	0.60@1.1 V
LNC-GDC[21]	LNC-GDC	Pure CO₂	2.32@2.0 V
LNC-GDC[22]	Ni-YSZ	50% H₂O-50% H₂	2.00@1.2 V
LSF-YSZ[27]	Ni-YSZ	50% H₂O-25% H₂-25% N₂	0.66@1.3 V
LSF-GDC[88]	Ni-YSZ	50% CO₂-50% H₂%	2.50@1.9 V
Pt-LSF-GDC[88]	Ni-YSZ	50% CO₂-50% H₂%	3.50@1.9 V
LSFNb[28]	Ni-YSZ	50% H₂O-50% H₂	0.89@1.3 V
LSFN-GDC[30]	LSFN-GDC	Pure CO₂	1.09@1.3 V
LSFM-GDC[32]	LSFM-GDC	Pure CO₂	1.11@2.0 V
BSFTa[34]	Ni-YSZ	70% CO₂-30% CO	0.81@1.5 V
BSF[34]	Ni-YSZ	70% CO₂-30% CO	0.45@1.5 V
LCFN-GDC[36]	LCFN-GDC	Pure CO₂	1.41@2.0 V
LSCF-GDC[16]	Ni-YSZ	90% H₂O-10% H₂	0.60@1.3 V
BSCFTa[53]	Ni-YSZ	70% H₂O-30% H₂	1.06@1.5 V
RuO₂-LBSCF[52]	Ni-YSZ	70% CO₂-30% CO	1.40@1.3 V
BCFNb[54]	Ni-GDC	40% H₂O-60% H₂	3.24@1.5 V
SFM[57]	SFM	40% H₂O-60% H₂	0.88@1.3 V
Ni-SFM-SDC[89]	SFM-SDC	74% H₂-26% H₂O	1.02@0.5 V
SFM-SDC[89]	SFM-SDC	74% H₂-26% H₂O	0.34@0.5 V
Ru-SFM-SDC[90]	SFM-SDC	74% H₂-26% H₂O	1.06@0.6 V
LNO[70]	Ni-YSZ	50% H₂-50% H₂O	1.42@1.5 V
LNCO[70]	Ni-YSZ	50% H₂-50% H₂O	1.60@1.5 V

Material	Advantage	Disadvantage
ABO₃_−δ-type perovskite oxides	High electronic conductivity	Sr segregation, low ionic conductivity
Double perovskites	Large D* and k*	Poor stability
RP phase oxides	Large D, k, matched TEC with electrolytes, and high OER activities	Poor stability
Spinel oxides	Suppressed Sr segregation	Poor stability and low ionic conductivity