图/表检索结果

欢迎访问《电化学（中英文）》期刊官方网站，今天是

期刊

出版年

Table 2. Correct excess-heat calculations, assuming no recombination
Table 1. Reproduction of Photograph of table presented by N. Lewis on May 1, 1989
Fig. 6. (a) Rietveld refinement results of LiFePO₄electrodes with Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂ after 1000 cycles. (b) Phase proportion of fully-charged baseline LiFePO₄electrode and Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂-added electrodes after 1000 cycles. (c) Photograph and (d, e) SEM images of disassembled graphite electrodes from the fully-charged cells using LiFePO₄ as cathode without and with Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂. (f) C 1s and (g) F 1s XPS spectra of graphite anode retrieved from the cell without and with Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂after 1000 cycles at delithiated state.
Fig. 5. (a) Average delithiation voltage and (b) average lithiation voltage of Li₂Ni_1-xCu_xO₂ materials. Density of states (DOS) of (c) Li₂NiO₂ and (d) Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂.
Fig. 4. (a) Schematic illustration of a graphite‖LiFePO₄ pouch cell with a nominal capacity of 3000 mAh assembled by the prototype line of Xiamen Hithium Energy Storage Technology Co., Ltd. LiFePO₄ pouch cell. (b) Cycling performance curves of pouch cell with Li₂NiO₂ and Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂ prelithiation additives. (c) The 60^th and (d) 1000^th charge/discharge curves.
Fig. 3. (a) Galvanostatic charge/discharge voltage profiles of Li₂Ni_1-xCu_xO₂ (x = 0, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5) materials at 0.1 C (1 C = 450 mA·g^-1). Galvanostatic charge/discharge voltage profiles of Li₂NiO₂ and Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂ at (b) 0.5 C and (c) 1 C. (d) Capacities of Li₂NiO₂ and Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂ at different current densities.
Fig. 2. SEM images of (a, b) Li₂NiO₂, (e) Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂. TEM and energy dispersive spectroscopic (EDS) mapping imagess of (c, d) Li₂NiO₂ and (f-h) Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂.
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of Li₂Ni_1-xCu_xO₂ (x = 0, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7) at (a) a full range and (b) an enlarged scale. Rietveld refinements of (c) Li₂NiO₂ and (d) Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂(the inset is crystal structure illustration of Li₂Ni_0.7Cu_0.3O₂).
Table 1. Different metal nitrides employed in cathodes of lithium-sulfur batteries
Fig. 7. (a) SEM image of WN, (b) TEM images and SAED patterns of WN, (c) Powder XRD pattern of WN. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [77], copyright 2017 Elsevier.
Fig. 6. Schematic synthesis procedure of MoN and MoN-S. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [72], copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Fig. 5. SEM images of (a) NCNs, (b) AlN@NCNs, and (c) AlN@NCNs/S. TEM images of (d) NCNs, (e) AlN@NCNs, and (f) AlN@NCNs/S. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [68], copyright 2023 Elsevier.
Fig. 4. (a) Schematic illustration of Co₄N sphere and its interaction with LiPSs during discharge/charge process of the lithium-sulfur battery. (b) Rate capability of Co₄N/S at different current rates. (c) The charge and discharge capacity versus cycle number at current densities of 2 C and 5 C [64].
Fig. 3. Schematic illustration for synthesizing the self-standing CC/VN/Co@NCNTs/S cathode electrode. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [57], copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Fig. 2 SEM images of TiO₂ tubes (a) and (b), and hollow TiN mesoporous tubes (c) and (d) [54].
Fig. 1. a) Schematic representation of lithium-ion batteries based on the intercalation reactions (left) and lithium-sulfur batterie based on the conversion reaction (right), b) an ideal charge-discharge curve with different sulfur-containing species at different stages, the inset presents the polysulfide shuttling mechanism. Reprinted with permission of Ref. [9], copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH.
Table 4. RTE at constant current density variation for single and three catalyst layers electrode of URFC.
Figure 9. RTE of URFC with MEA containing single and three catalyst layers under different current densities.
Figure 8. MEA polarization curves of electrodes with (a) single catalyst layer and (b) three catalyst layers
Figure 7. The hydrogen production rate at different current densities.

跳至
页
第1页
共167页
共3324条记录