葡萄糖乙酸钠不同基质微生物燃料电池电化学性能对比研究

doi:10.13208/j.electrochem.150926

电化学（中英文） ›› 2016, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 81-87. doi: 10.13208/j.electrochem.150926

葡萄糖乙酸钠不同基质微生物燃料电池电化学性能对比研究

樊磊¹，赵煜¹，李婷¹，原沁波^1，2，王恩志²，王晓斌¹，王俊文^1*

1.太原理工大学洁净化工研究所，山西太原 030024；2. 清华大学水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室，北京 100000

收稿日期:2015-09-26 修回日期:2015-11-10 出版日期:2016-02-29 发布日期:2015-12-01
通讯作者: 王俊文 E-mail:1935955327@qq.com
基金资助:
山西省基金项目（2014011014-6）资助

The Study on Comparison of Electrochemical Performance in Microbial Fuel Cell with Glucose and Sodium Acetate Acting as Substrates

FAN Lei¹, ZHAO Yu¹, LI Ting¹, YUAN Qin-bo^1,2, WANG En-zhi², WANG Xiao-bin¹, WANG Jun-wen^1*

1.Institute of Clean Technique for Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100000, China

Received:2015-09-26 Revised:2015-11-10 Published:2016-02-29 Online:2015-12-01
Contact: WANG Jun-wen E-mail:1935955327@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文通过接种生活污水处理厂的好氧污泥和厌氧污泥，撘建两个双室微生物燃料电池(MFC，Microbial fuel cell)，分别以葡萄糖、乙酸钠作为基质，在0.0335 mol•L^-1基质浓度下研究不同基质微生物燃料电池的产电性能. 研究表明：葡萄糖体系的阳极半电池阻抗为222 Ω，乙酸钠体系为213.67 Ω，说明两种不同有机基质对电池内阻无明显影响. 葡萄糖、乙酸钠体系的交换电流密度i⁰分别为3.463 mA•m^-2、 5.987 mA•m^-2；COD去除率分别为50.6%、55.8%；库仑效率分别为42.1%、46.2%. 葡萄糖为基质时最大输出功率密度为394.2 mW•m^-2，相应的最大电流密度为1800 mA•m^-2；乙酸钠为基质时最大输出功率密度为311.9 mW•m^-2，相应的最大电流密度为1527.5 mA•m^-2. 葡萄糖代谢过程复杂并不单一，且代谢不彻底，乙酸钠分子简单更容易代谢，因此乙酸钠的库伦效率及COD去除率均高于葡萄糖，由以上数据可以得出葡萄糖为基质的燃料电池产电性能较好.

关键词: 微生物燃料电池, 葡萄糖, 乙酸钠, 电化学性能

Abstract:

By inoculating aerobic sludge and anaerobic sludge from the sewage treatment plant, two sets of dual-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were built with either glucose or sodium acetate acting as a substrate. Accordingly, the electrochemical performances of MFCs were explored with the concentration of the substrates being 0.0335 mol•L^-1. The results of the comparative study in glucose system and sodium acetate system showed that the impedance values of anodic half cell were 222 Ω for glucose and 213.67 Ω for sodium acetate, implying no significant effect on the internal resistance in battery with the different substrates. The exchange current densities were 3.463 mA•m^-2 and 5.987 mA•m^-2, while the COD removal rates 50.6% and 55.8% for glucose and sodium acetate, respectively. Furthermore, the coulombic efficiencies reached 42.1% and 46.2% with the maximum output power density of 394.2 mW•m^-2 and 311.9 mW•m^-2 for glucose and sodium acetate, respectively. Since the process of glucose metabolism is more complicated with less complete metabolism as compared with the simpler sodium acetate molecules with more facilitated metabolism, the coulombic efficiency and COD removal rate in sodium acetate system were higher than those in glucose system, which led to better eletricity production capacity.

Key words: Microbial fuel cell, glucose, sodium acetate, electrochemical performance

中图分类号:

O646

樊磊1，赵煜1，李婷1，原沁波1，2，王恩志2，王晓斌1，王俊文1*. 葡萄糖乙酸钠不同基质微生物燃料电池电化学性能对比研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2016, 22(1): 81-87.

FAN Lei1, ZHAO Yu1, LI Ting1, YUAN Qin-bo1,2, WANG En-zhi2, WANG Xiao-bin1, WANG Jun-wen1*. The Study on Comparison of Electrochemical Performance in Microbial Fuel Cell with Glucose and Sodium Acetate Acting as Substrates[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry, 2016, 22(1): 81-87.

参考文献

[1] F.J. Hernández-Fernández, A. Pérez de los Ríos, M.J. Salar-García, V.M. Ortiz-Martínez, L.J. Lozano-Blanco, C. Godínez, F. Tomás-Alonso, J. Recent progress and perspectives in microbial fuel cells for bioenergy generation and wastewater treatment[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 138: 284–297.

[2] Hou M(侯明), Yi B L(衣宝廉). Progress and perspective of fuel cell technology[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2012, 18(1): 1-13.

[3] Liu H, Cheng S A, Logan B E. Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2005, 39 (2), 658–662.

[4] Kim J R, Jung S H, Regan J M, et al. Electricity generation and microbial community analysis of alcohol powered microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(13): 2568–2577.

[5] Anna Vilajeliu-Pons, Sebastià Puig, Narcís Pous, Inmaculada Salcedo-Dávila, Lluís Bañeras, Maria Dolors Balaguer, Jesús Colprim. Microbiome characterization of MFCs used for the treatment of swine manure[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 288: 60–68.

[6] Wang J Q(汪家权), Xia X L(夏雪兰), Ding W W(丁巍巍). Operating parameters for a microbial fuel cell in treating phenol-containing wastewater[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae(环境科学学报), 2010, 30(4): 735- 741.

[7] Dong Y, Qu Y P, He W H, et al. A 90-liter stackable baffled microbial fuel cell for brewery wastewater treatment based on energy self-sufficient mode[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 195: 66–72.

[8] Wen Q, Wu Y, Zhao L X, et al. Electricity generation and brewery wastewater treatment from sequential anode-cathode microbial fuel cell[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B, 2010, 11(2): 87–93.

[9] Motos P R, Heijne A, Weijden R, et al. High rate copper and energy recovery in microbial fuel cells[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015, 6: 1-8.

[10] Rikame S S, Mungray A A, Mungray A K. Electricity generation from acidogenic food waste leachate using dual chamber mediator less microbial fuel cell [J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2012, 75(2012): 131–137.

[11] Chae K J, Choi M J, Lee J W, et al. Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(14): 3518–3525.

[12] Liu C M(刘春梅), Liu L(刘磊), Xu B(徐斌), et al. Effects of inlet substrate and buffer concentrations on MFC performance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology(环境科学与技术), 2015, 38(2)： 48-51.

[13] Larrosa G A, Scott K, Head I M, et al. Effect of temperature on the performance of microbial fuel cells[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(12) : 3985–3994.

[14] Liao Q, Zhang J, Li J, et al. Electricity generation and COD removal of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) operated with alkaline substrates[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(33): 19349–19354.

[15] Liu Z D, Liu J, Zhang S P, et al. Study of operational performance and electrical response on mediator-less microbial fuel cells fed with carbon- and protein-rich substrates[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 45(3): 185-191.

[16] Bao Y(宝玥), Wu X Q(吴霞琴). Progress in research for biofuel cell[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2004, 10(1): 1-8

[17] Yu J R(于景荣), Xing D M(邢丹敏), Liu F Q(刘富强), et al. Research progress on proton exchange membranes of fuel cells[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2001, 7(4): 385-395.

[18] He Z, Wagner N, Minteer S D, et al. An upflow microbial fuel cell with an Interior cathode: assessment of the internal resistance by impedance spectroscopy[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(17): 5212-5217.

[19] Katz E, Willner I. Probing bimolecular interactions at conductive and semiconductive surfaces by impedance spectroscopy: routes to impedimetric immunosensors, DNA sensor, and enzyme biosensors[J]. Electroanalysis, 2003, 15, 913-947.

[20] Wagner N. Characterization of membrane electrode assemblies in polymer electrolyte fuel cells using a.c. impedance spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2002, 32: 859-863.

[21] Hou M Y(侯孟炎), Wang K(王珂), Dong X L(董晓丽), et al. Synthesis graphene wrapped Li-rich layered metal oxide and its electrochemical performance[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2015, 21(3): 195-200.

[22] Rabaey K, Boon N, Siciliano S D, et al. Biofuel cells select for microbial consortia that self-mediate electron transfer[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70(9): 5373-5382.

[23] Reguera G, Mccarthy K D, Metha T. Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires[J]. Nature, 2005, 455: 1098-1101.

[24] Cheng S A, Liu H, Logan B E. Power densities using different cathode catalysts(Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders(Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2006, 40(1): 364-369.

[25] 查全性. 电极过程动力学导论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001: 130-139.

[26] Kim J R, Premier G C, Hawkes F R, et al. Modular tubular microbial fuel cells for energy recovery during sucrose wastewater treatment at low organic loading rate[J]. Bioresour Technology, 2010, 101(4): 1190-1198.

葡萄糖乙酸钠不同基质微生物燃料电池电化学性能对比研究

The Study on Comparison of Electrochemical Performance in Microbial Fuel Cell with Glucose and Sodium Acetate Acting as Substrates

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

[1]	杨云锐, 董欢欢, 郝志强, 何祥喜, 杨卓, 李林, 侴术雷. 高性能锂硫电池用钴/碳复合材料硫宿主[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2023, 29(4): 2217003-.
[2]	陈思, 郑淞生, 郑雷铭, 张叶涵, 王兆林. 水热法制备锂电池Si@C负极材料的工艺优化研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2022, 28(8): 2112221-.
[3]	贠潇如, 陈宇方, 肖培涛, 郑春满. 关于水系锌离子电池中无氧钒基正极材料的综述[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2022, 28(11): 2219004-.
[4]	李江, 李作鹏, 白云峰, 罗宿星, 郭永, 鲍雅妍, 李容, 刘海燕, 冯锋. 一种基于电沉积3D花状CoS在自支撑石墨烯胶带电极上的非酶葡萄糖传感器的研究与应用[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2022, 28(1): 2104211-.
[5]	梁振浪, 杨耀, 李豪, 刘丽英, 施志聪. 基于不同前驱体制备的硬碳负极材料的储锂性能[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2021, 27(2): 177-184.
[6]	吴凯. Na₃V₂(PO₄)₂O₂F的合成及其在钠离子电池中的应用[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2021, 27(1): 56-62.
[7]	戴琬琳, 鲁志伟, 叶建山. 二次刻蚀聚酰亚胺负载Cu_xO纳米复合物薄膜电极用于葡萄糖的快速测定[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2019, 25(2): 260-269.
[8]	孙梦雷, 张达奇, 冯金奎, 倪江锋. 钒基电极材料研究进展[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2019, 25(1): 45-54.
[9]	何大平，木士春. 质子交换膜燃料电池铂电催化剂稳定策略[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2018, 24(6): 655-663.
[10]	王鸿辉，马明洁，冯婕，康黄雅，黄文杰. 钕掺杂二氧化铅复合阳极的电化学性能研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2018, 24(4): 367-374.
[11]	张伶潇，赵惠慧，张丽娟，付予. Ag-TiO₂-MnO₂复合材料的制备与电化学性能研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2018, 24(3): 292-299.
[12]	李全一，杨琪，赵艳红. 二氧化钼-碳复合涂层的电化学性能研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2018, 24(2): 160-165.
[13]	王友，曾一文，钟星，刘星，汤泉. 锂离子电池负极材料Li₃V₂(BO₃)₃/C 复合材料的合成及电化学性能研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2018, 24(2): 174-181.
[14]	刘兴亮，杨茂萍，汪伟伟, 曹勇. 分级过程对LiFePO₄/C电池性能的影响[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2017, 23(6): 661-666.
[15]	罗化峰，乔元栋. 纤维素微孔锂电隔膜的制备及性能研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2017, 23(5): 610-616.