无空气环境下平管型SOEC电解堆CO2/H2O共电解稳定性研究

doi:10.61558/2993-074X.3518

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文使用平管型SOEC电解堆，探究了空气极无吹扫气环境下CO₂/H₂O共电解的瞬态性能和稳定性。结果表明，电解堆空气极在有、无吹扫气时的瞬时电解性能几乎一致。在750 ℃恒温、空气极无空气吹扫、0.67 A·cm^-2电流密度下共电解超过200 h，电解堆电压下降速率约为0.203%/100 h。微观结构结果显示，电解堆中电解池的Ni颗粒损失明显，空气极集流层表面形成了绝缘相SrCrO₄，上述共同因素是导致电解池性能衰减的主要原因。本文研究为SOEC电解堆在无空气环境下的高能效电解合成燃料应用提供了参考。

关键词: 共电解, 稳定性, 无空气, 电解堆, 固体氧化物电解池

Abstract:

This work investigates the transient performance and stability of CO₂/H₂O co-electrolysis in an air-free environment using a flat-tube solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) stack. The results showed that the transient behavior of the stack with and without blowing gas into the air electrode is almost the same. With a current density of 0.67A·cm^-2 @750 °C, the stack operated for over 200 h under co-electrolysis conditions without air blowing, and the voltage drop rate of the stack was approximately 0.203%/100 hours. Microstructure analyses revealed a significant loss of nickel particles and an apparent formation of an insulating phase strontium chromate (SrCrO₄) on the surface of the current collection layer of the air electrode, which are identified as key factors contributing to the performance degradation of the stack. This study provides a reference for development of efficient fuel preparation technology based on SOEC stack in airless environments.

Key words: Co-electrolysis, Stability, Air-free, Electrolysis stack, Solid oxide electrolysis cell

钟小慧, 王飞, 武安祺, 韩贝贝, 王建新, 官万兵. 无空气环境下平管型SOEC电解堆CO₂/H₂O共电解稳定性研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2025, 31(4): 2144121.

Zhong Xiao-Hui, Wang Fei, Wu An-Qi, Han Bei-Bei, Wang Jian-Xin, Guan Wan-Bing. Performance of CO₂/H₂O Co-Electrolysis in a Flat-Tube Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell Stack under an Air-Free Environment[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry, 2025, 31(4): 2144121.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://electrochem.xmu.edu.cn/CN/10.61558/2993-074X.3518

https://electrochem.xmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2025/V31/I4/2144121

图/表 6

参考文献 28

[1]	Dybkjaer I, Aasberg-Petersen K. Synthesis gas technology large‐scale applications[J]. Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2016, 94(4): 607-612.
[2]	Kousheshi N, Yari M, Paykani A, Mehr A, Fuente G. Effect of syngas composition on the combustion and emissions characteristics of a syngas/diesel RCCI engine[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(1): 212.
[3]	Shahbaz M, Yusup S, Inayat A, Patrick D, Pratama A. Application of response surface methodology to investigate the effect of different variables on conversion of palm kernel shell in steam gasification using coal bottom ash[J]. Appl. Energy, 2016, 184: 1306-1315.
[4]	Yoon S J, Lee J. Hydrogen-rich syngas production through coal and charcoal gasification using microwave steam and air plasma torch[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(22): 17093-17100.
[5]	Szczygieł J, Chojnacka K, Skrzypczak D, Izydorczyk G, Moustakas K, Kułażyński M. Using greenhouse gases in the synthesis gas production processes: Thermodynamic conditions[J]. J. Environ. Manag., 2022, 325(A): 116463.
[6]	Yentekakis I V, Panagiotopoulou P, Artemakis G. A review of recent efforts to promote dry reforming of methane (DRM) to syngas production via bimetallic catalyst formulations[J]. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy, 2021, 296: 120210.
[7]	Zhao R, Cao K, Ye R L, Tang Y T, Du C, Liu F, Zhao Y K, Chen R, Shan B. Deciphering the stability mechanism of Pt-Ni/Al₂O₃ catalysts in syngas production via DRM[J]. Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 491: 151966.
[8]	Chen X B, Guan C Z, Xiao G P, Du X L, Wang J Q. Syngas production by high temperature steam/CO coelectrolysis using solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Faraday Discuss., 2015, 182: 329-339.
[9]	Cui C S, Wang Y, Tong Y C, Wang S W, Chen C S, Zhan Z L. Syngas production through CH₄-assisted co-electrolysis of H₂O and CO₂ in La_0.8Sr_0.2Cr_0.5Fe_0.5O_3-δ-Zr_0.84Y_0.16O_2-δ electrode-supported solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(39): 20305-20312.
[10]	Fei Y X, Li A, Zhang C, Tu H Y, Zhu L, Huang Z. Performance optimization of solid oxide electrolysis cell for syngas production by high temperature co-electrolysis via differential evolution algorithm with practical constraints[J]. Energy Convers. Manag., 2023, 300: 117911.
[11]	Li Z, Zhang H, Xu H R, Xuan J. Advancing the multiscale understanding on solid oxide electrolysis cells via modelling approaches: A review[J]. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 2021, 141: 110863.
[12]	Zhang B Z, Zhang Z, Zhang L J, Tang K B, Xia C R. A perovskite infiltrated cathode of metal-supported solid oxide electrolysis cell for CO₂ electrolysis[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 49(C): 417-423.
[13]	Zheng Y F, Zhou J, Zhang L, Liu Q L, Pan Z H, Chan S. High-temperature electrolysis of simulated flue gas in solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2018, 280: 206-215.
[14]	Guan W B, Du Z G, Wang J X, Jiang L, Yang J, Zhou X D. Mechanisms of performance degradation induced by thermal cycling in solid oxide fuel cell stacks with flat-tube anode-supported cells based on double-sided cathodes[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(38): 19840-19846.
[15]	Sun X F, Hendriksen P, Hauch A, Clausen A, Lehtinen T, Noponen M. Effect of anode side purge gas on the degradation of solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. ECS Trans., 2021, 103: 1083.
[16]	Liu Z, Han B B, Lu Z Y, Guan W B, Li Y Y, Song C J, Chen L, Singhal S. Efficiency and stability of hydrogen production from seawater using solid oxide electrolysis cells[J]. Appl. Energy. 2021, 300: 117439.
[17]	Song Z H, Pan H, Wan G C, Wu A Q, Chen Q J, Guan W B, Singhal S. Enhancing durability of solid oxide cells for hydrogen production from seawater by designing nano-structured Sm_0.5Sr_0.5Co_3-δ infiltrated air electrodes[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(70): 27095-27104.
[18]	Hu X G, Yang Y P, Han B B, Huang X R, Lei J Y, Sang J K, Wu A Q, Liu Z, Lu Z Y, Guan W B. Efficiency and stability of seawater electrolysis through flat-tube solid oxide cell stack without air[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 55: 909-916.
[19]	Liang J J, Han M F. Different performance and mechanisms of CO₂ electrolysis with CO and H₂ as protective gases in solid oxide electrolysis cell[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(43): 18606-18618.
[20]	Stempien J, Liu Q L, Ni M, Sun Q, Chan S. Physical principles for the calculation of equilibrium potential for co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide in a solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC)[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 147: 490-497.
[21]	Xiong M, Han B B, Yao Y, Wu A Q, Gao Y F, Guan W B. Effect of seawater on the performance of flat-tube solid oxide cell for CO₂/H₂O co-electrolysis[J]. Fuel, 2023, 357(C): 130039.
[22]	Xi C Q, Sang J K, Wu A Q, Yang J, Qi X P, Guan W B, Wang J X, Singhal S. Electrochemical performance and durability of flat-tube solid oxide electrolysis cells for H₂O/CO₂ co-electrolysis[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(18): 10166-10174.
[23]	Rao M, Sun X, Hagen A. A comparative study of durability of solid oxide electrolysis cells tested for Co-electrolysis under galvanostatic and potentiostatic conditions[J]. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2018, 165(10): F748-F755.
[24]	Tao Y K, Ebbesen S, Mogensen M. Degradation of solid oxide cells during co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide at high current densities[J]. J. Power Sources, 2016, 328: 452-462.
[25]	Sun X, Hendriksen P, Mogensen M, Chen M. Degradation in solid oxide electrolysis cells during long term testing[J]. Fuel Cells, 2019, 19(6): 740-747.
[26]	Li C L, Wu A Q, Xi C Q, Guan W B, Chen L, Singhal S. High reversible cycling performance of carbon dioxide electrolysis by flat-tube solid oxide cell[J]. Appl. Energy, 2022, 314: 118969.
[27]	Hu B X, Krishnan S, Liang C Y, Heo S, Aphale A, Ramprasad R, Singh P. Experimental and thermodynamic evaluation of La_1-xSr_xMnO_3±δ and La_1-xSr_xCo_1-yFe_yO_3-δ cathodes in Cr-containing humidified air[J]. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(15): 10208-10216.
[28]	Abernathy H, Koep E, Compson C, Cheng Z, Liu M L. Monitoring Ag-Cr interactions in SOFC cathodes using Raman spectroscopy[J]. J. Phys. Chem. C., 2008, 112(34): 13299-13303.

Year	Structure	Active area	Operating condition	Run time	Degradation rate	Ref.
2024	1-cell, flat-tube Ni-YSZ/YSZ/GDC/LSCF	60 cm²	750 °C, with air 20%H₂+40%CO₂+40%H₂O	300 mA·cm^-2, 410 h	7.37%/kh	[21]
2022	1-cell, flat-tube Ni-YSZ/YSZ/GDC/LSCF	60 cm²	750 °C, with air 20%H₂+40%CO₂+40%H₂O	300 mA·cm^-2, 1000 h	10.69%/kh	[22]
2018	1-cell, planar Ni-YSZ/YSZ/CGO/LSCF	16 cm²	750 °C, with air 10%H₂+25%CO₂+65%H₂O	0.75 A·cm^-2, 1055 h 1.2 V, 1005 h	First 200 h 58%/kh Last 855 h 10%/ kh First 200 h 181%/kh Last 805 h 14%/ kh	[23]
2016	1-cell, planar Ni-YSZ/YSZ/LSM-YSZ	16 cm²	800 °C, with air 10%H₂+45%CO₂+45%H₂O	1.5 A·cm^-2, 682 h 2.0 A·cm^-2, 678 h	275 mV/kh (19.37%/kh) 452 mV/kh (30.13%/kh)	[24]
2024	3-cell, flat-tube Ni-YSZ/YSZ/GDC/LSCF-GDC	60 cm²	750 °C, without air 20%H₂+20%CO₂+60%H₂O	0.67 A·cm^-2, 244 h	0.203%/100h	This work

无空气环境下平管型SOEC电解堆CO₂/H₂O共电解稳定性研究

Performance of CO₂/H₂O Co-Electrolysis in a Flat-Tube Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell Stack under an Air-Free Environment

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

Metrics

[1]	汤亚飞, 武安祺, 韩贝贝, 刘华, 包善军, 林王林, 陈铭, 官万兵, Subhash C. Singhal. 以掺氢天然气为燃料直接内重整固体氧化物电池堆的稳定性[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2024, 30(1): 2314001-.
[2]	邹庚, 冯炜程, 宋月锋, 汪国雄. 固体氧化物电解池阳极材料研究进展[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2023, 29(2): 2215006-.
[3]	汪恒吉, 陈文国, 全周益, 赵凯, 孙毅飞, 陈旻, 奥坚科·弗拉基米尔. 多孔陶瓷支撑型管式固体氧化物电解池性能研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2023, 29(12): 2204131-.
[4]	倪静, 施兆平, 王显, 王意波, 吴鸿翔, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 低铱酸性氧析出电催化剂的研究进展[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2022, 28(9): 2214010-.
[5]	应方, 许珊珊, 许燕冰, 梁苗苗, 李剑锋. Fe₃O₄磁性纳米颗粒催化电化学降解土霉素的研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2022, 28(4): 2107141-.
[6]	王越, 张立敏, 田阳. 基于电化学分子探针合理设计的高选择性长程活体分析[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2022, 28(3): 2108451-.
[7]	魏家祺, 陈晓东, 李述周. 电化学合成纳米材料和小分子材料在电解制氢领域的应用[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2022, 28(10): 2214012-.
[8]	李姝谨, 曹志康, 王文凯, 张晓菡, 向兴德. 硫酸盐功能电解液增强水系钠离子电池NaTi₂(PO₄)₃/C负极材料电化学性能的研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2021, 27(6): 605-613.
[9]	黄夏敏, 张丽红, 吴顺情, 杨勇, 朱梓忠. ANiN(A = Li, Na, Mg, Ca)的结构、热力学、弹性和电子性质的第一性原理研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2021, 27(3): 339-350.
[10]	孟全华, 邓雯雯, 李长明. 类石墨烯类活性炭材料的简易合成及其在锂硫电池中的应用研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2020, 26(5): 740-749.
[11]	毛庆, 李冰玉, 景维云, 赵健, 刘松, 黄延强, 杜兆龙. 膜电极构型CO₂还原电解单池的稳定性研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2020, 26(3): 359-369.
[12]	李雪, 龚正良. PEO基聚合物电解质及其锂硫电池性能研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2020, 26(3): 338-346.
[13]	潘晓娜, 刘丽来, 王治璞, 王丹, 李云, 杨培霞, 张锦秋, 安茂忠. 离子液体凝胶聚合物电解质的三元组分相互作用研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2020, 26(3): 406-412.
[14]	李一航, 夏长荣. 固体氧化物电解池直接电解CO₂的研究进展[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2020, 26(2): 162-174.
[15]	王杜丹, 王非, 翟欢欢, 李玉鹏, 杨纳川, 陈康华. 富锂层状正极材料Li₂MnO₃的表面改性及其电化学性能研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2020, 26(2): 289-297.