高镍三元正极材料动力学性能的单颗粒研究

doi:10.13208/j.electrochem.170209

电化学（中英文） ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 81-88. doi: 10.13208/j.electrochem.170209

• 电镀与表面精饰近期研究专辑( 哈尔滨工业大学安茂忠教授主编) • 上一篇下一篇

高镍三元正极材料动力学性能的单颗粒研究

魏奕民^*

宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司，福建，352100

收稿日期:2017-02-07 修回日期:2017-03-19 出版日期:2018-02-28 发布日期:2017-04-20
通讯作者: 魏奕民 E-mail:WeiYiM@CATLBattery.com
基金资助:
宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司项目（No. RD-RXNPRFTM001）资助

Intrinsic Kinetic Properties of Ternary Material for Lithium Ion Batteries Assessed by Single Particle Microelectrode

WEI Yi-min^*

Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd.，Ningde 352100, Fujian, China

Received:2017-02-07 Revised:2017-03-19 Published:2018-02-28 Online:2017-04-20
Contact: WEI Yi-min E-mail:WeiYiM@CATLBattery.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

镍钴锰三元材料LiNi_xCo_yMn_zO₂ (x + y + z = 1)在容量、倍率、循环及热稳定性等方面的性能往往受到金属元素Ni、Co、Mn含量的显著影响. 其中，增加元素Ni的含量有助于提高材料的比容量。因此，LiNi_0.6Co_0.2Mn _0.2O₂（NCM622）和LiNi_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1O₂（NCM811）成为了目前研究最为广泛的两款高镍三元正极材料. 但目前针对这两款材料的对比研究主要集中在材料比容量、热稳定性和循环稳定性的影响方面，而对材料动力学性能的研究较少，尤其是对材料本征动力学参数的表征尚未见报道. 本文采用单颗粒微电极技术，以粒径相同的 NCM622 和 NCM811 颗粒为研究对象，排除导电剂、粘结剂和电极结构的影响，从材料本征动力学性能评估的角度出发，分析了Ni元素的含量对这两款材料的充放电性能、交流阻抗谱、锂离子固相扩散系数和倍率放电性能等的影响. 结果表明，与 NCM622 相比，随着Ni²⁺和Ni³⁺总含量的增加，NCM811 表现出更高的充放电容量、锂离子固相扩散系数、电化学反应活性和倍率放电性能. 以 20 C 放电, NCM811 材料的放电容量保持率仍可达到80.8%以上.

关键词: 高镍三元材料, 单颗粒微电极, 交流阻抗, 锂离子扩散系数

Abstract:

Electrochemical performances such as capacity, rate, cycle and thermal stability of the nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) and manganese (Mn) ternary cathode material, LiNi_xCo_yMn_zO₂ (x + y + z = 1), are significantly influenced by the proportion of Ni, Co, and Mn elements. To obtain higher specific capacity, LiNi_0.6Co_0.2Mn _0.2O₂ (NCM622) and LiNi_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1O₂ (NCM811) with high amounts of Ni element were employed for the lithium ion batteries. By now, many studies have been focusing on the thermal and cycling stabilities of NCM622 and NCM811. However, there is lack of reports on the intrinsic kinetic properties of these two cathode materials. In this work, single particle microelectrode has been employed to investigate the intrinsic kinetic properties of NCM622 and NCM811 without the influences of binder, conductive agent, and electrode structure. Charge-discharge test, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and potentiostatic intermittent titration (PITT) methods were used for the evaluation of the kinetic properties of NCM622 and NCM811. Due to the increased Ni²⁺/Ni³⁺ and decreased Mn⁴⁺ amounts, the NCM811 material presented better kinetics properties and higher columbic efficiency compared with NCM622. The discharge capacity retention of NCM811 was above 80.8% at 20C compared to 0.5C, which is much higher than that of NCM622 with 68.6%.

Key words: ternary material, single particle microelectrode, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, Li⁺ diffusion coefficient

中图分类号:

O646

魏奕民. 高镍三元正极材料动力学性能的单颗粒研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2018, 24(1): 81-88.

WEI Yi-min. Intrinsic Kinetic Properties of Ternary Material for Lithium Ion Batteries Assessed by Single Particle Microelectrode[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry, 2018, 24(1): 81-88.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://electrochem.xmu.edu.cn/CN/10.13208/j.electrochem.170209

https://electrochem.xmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V24/I1/81

参考文献

[1] Konishi H, Yuasa T, Yoshikawa M. Thermal stability of Li_1-yNi_xMn_(1-x)/2Co_(1-x)/2O₂ layer-structured cathode materials used in Li-Ion batteries[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(16): 6884-6888.
[2] Bak S-M, Hu E Y, Zhou Y N, et al. Structural changes and thermal stability of charged LiNi_xMn_yCo_zO₂ cathode materials studied by combined in situ time-resolved XRD and mass spectroscopy[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(24): 22594-22601.
[3] Noh H J, Youn S, Yoon C S, et al. Comparison of the structural and electrochemical properties of layered Li[Ni_xCo_yMn_z]O₂(x = 1/3, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.85) cathode material for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 233: 121-130.
[4] Wei Y, Zheng J X, Cui S H, et al. Kinetics tuning of Li-ion diffusion in layered Li(Ni_xMn_yCo_z)O₂[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(26): 8364-8367.
[5] Uchida I, Fujiyoshi H, Waki S, et al. Microvoltammetric studies on single particles of battery active materials[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 1997, 68(1): 139-144.
[6] Dokko K, Nishizawa M, Horikoshi S, et al. In situ observation of LiNiO₂ single-particle fracture during Li-ion extraction and insertion[J]. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2000, 3(3): 125-127.
[7] Munakata H, Takemura B, Saito T, et al. Evaluation of real performance of LiFePO₄ by using single particle technique[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 217: 444-448.
[8] Huang Y H, Wang F M, Huang T T, et al. Micro-electrode linked cyclic voltammetry study reveals ultra-fast discharge and high ionic transfer behavior of LiFePO₄[J]. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2012, 7(2): 1205-1213.
[9] Dokko K, Nakata N, Suzuki Y, et al. High-rate lithium deintercalation from lithiated graphite single-particle electrode[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010, 114(18): 8646-8650.
[10] Zuleta M, Bjornbom P, Lundblad A. Effects of pore surface oxidation on electrochemical and mass-transport properties of nanoporous carbon[J]. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2005, 152(2): A270-A276.
[11] Nishikawa K, Munakata H, Kanamura K. In-situ observation of one silicon particle during the first charging[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 243: 630-634.
[12] Nishikawa K, Moon J, Kanamura K. In-situ observation of volume expansion behavior of a silicon particle in various electrolyte[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 302: 46-52.
[13] Wang F Q(王福庆), Wei Y M(魏奕民), Su Y Z(苏育专), et al. Fast and accurate evaluation of LiFePO₄ cathode materials by single particle microelectrode[J]. Journal of Electrochemistry(电化学), 2015, 21(6): 566-571.
[14] Miller D J, Proff C, Wen J G, et al. Observation of microstructural evolution in Li battery cathode oxide particles by In situ electron microscopy[J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2013, 3(8): 1098-1103.
[15] Xie J, Imanishi N, Zhang T, et al. Li-ion diffusion kinetics in LiFePO₄ thin film prepared by radio frequency magnetron sputtering[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 54(20): 4631-4637.

高镍三元正极材料动力学性能的单颗粒研究

Intrinsic Kinetic Properties of Ternary Material for Lithium Ion Batteries Assessed by Single Particle Microelectrode

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

[1]	李丽娟, 朱振东, 代娟, 王蓉蓉, 彭文. 锂离子电池正极材料Li[Ni_xCo_yMn_z]O₂ (x = 0.6, 0.85)相变对比[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2021, 27(4): 405-412.
[2]	吉维肖, 王功伟, 王强, 白力军, 屈德扬. 多孔电极在电化学体系中的应用[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2020, 26(5): 576-595.
[3]	郭建伟，王建龙. 电化学阻抗谱在质子交换膜燃料电池动态的先导应用[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2018, 24(6): 687-696.
[4]	王福庆，魏奕民，苏育专，毛秉伟，吴凯，赵丰刚，陈春雷，李行璐，种晋. LiFePO₄单颗粒电化学本征性能的快速精确评测[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2015, 21(6): 566-571.
[5]	王琴, 周丽丽, 沈重亨, 王琪, 黄令, 李君涛, 孙世刚. 尖晶石LiNi_0.5Mn_1.5O₄正极材料首周充放电过程的结构与动力学研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2015, 21(4): 312-318.
[6]	李扬，黄波*，袁梦，张志秋，刘宗尧，唐旭晨，朱新坚. 中温固体氧化物燃料电池LaNi_0.6Fe_0.4O_3-δ-Gd_0.2Ce_0.8O₂梯度复合阴极制备及交流阻抗性能[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2014, 20(1): 45-50.
[7]	任睿轩, 黄波, 朱新坚, 胡一星, 丁小益, 刘宗尧, 刘烨彬. Gd_0.2Ce_0.8O₂包覆LaNi_0.6Fe_0.4O_3-δ阴极制备及性能[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2013, 19(3): 275-280.
[8]	吴秉亮. 一些电化学交流阻抗复数平面图旋转的物理意义[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2013, 19(1): 79-82.
[9]	刘希龙, 吴春燕, 周方, 刘红生, 华英杰, 王崇太, 刘晓旸. Keggin型缺位硅钨杂多阴离子的电化学性质及电催化还原H2O2[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2012, 18(2): 174-180.
[10]	刘文, 王苗, 陈继涛, 张新祥, 周恒辉. 锂离子电池正极材料LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2的合成及其高温容量衰减研究[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2012, 18(2): 118-124.
[11]	刘珩, 黄波, 朱新坚. 中温固体氧化物燃料电池LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3-δ阴极材料的制备及性能表征[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2011, 17(4): 421-426.
[12]	汪芸芸, 黄波, 朱新坚, 胡万起, 余晴春, . 固体氧化物燃料电池LSCM-CeO_2/Ni-ScSZ复合阳极制备及性能表征[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2010, 16(1): 108-111.
[13]	徐群杰, 李春香, 倪钰宏, 周国定, . 3-氨基-1,2,4-三氮唑和Na_2WO_4复合缓蚀剂对黄铜的缓蚀协同作用[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2009, 15(2): 190-193.
[14]	刘莉, 李瑛, 王福会, . 中温NaCl-水蒸气协同作用下铁的腐蚀机理[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2009, 15(2): 179-183.
[15]	唐聿明, 张杰, 左禹, . 萘系减水剂混凝土钢筋的电化学腐蚀[J]. 电化学（中英文）, 2009, 15(2): 152-156.